CVE-2026-55255: Langflow Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key Vulnerability
Advisory generated from the CVE record, CISA, Exploit Observer and VEDAS: what it is, whether it is exploited, who is affected, and how to fix and detect it.
Generated by VEDAS. Scores as of 2026-11-01 19:19 UTC. Rebuilt every few hours from cve-scores, CISA KEV and vedas-signatures. How this works and its limits.
What it is
Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to 1.9.1, an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in /api/v1/responses endpoint allows an authenticated attacker to execute any flow belonging to another user by specifying the victim’s flow ID in the request. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.1.
Description quoted from the CVE record (assigned by GitHub_M, published 2026-06-23).
Weakness: CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
How it can be exploited
Exploitable over the network with high attack complexity needing low privileges and no user interaction. Impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability low. CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
CISA assessment (SSVC): CISA assesses exploitation as active. Automatable: no. Technical impact: total.
- On CISA KEV since
- 2026-07-07
- US federal deadline
- 2026-07-10
- Ransomware use
- Not known
Public exploit evidence (Exploit Observer)
Also known as: BDU:2026-10993, EUVD-2026-38517, GHSA-qrpv-q767-xqq2
VEDAS cluster: VEDAS:CRISPYNUGGET
Exploit Observer links 1 piece of public exploit code or detection modules that name this CVE or one of its aliases.
Exploit code and modules (1)
Code that names this CVE. A repository can be a working exploit, a scanner, a fake or malware; read it before running anything.
- Code repository: https://github.com/rootdirective-sec/cve-2026-55255-lab
Research and write-ups (1)
- Research or write-up: https://webflow.sysdig.com/blog/understanding-langflow-cve-2026-55255-and-why-higher-cvss-vulnerabilities-arent-always-the-most-exploited
Vulnerability databases and vendor advisories (7)
Catalogue entries, not exploit evidence.
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/enisa/EUVD-2026-38517
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qrpv-q767-xqq2
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-55255
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55255
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-qrpv-q767-xqq2
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2026-55255
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-55255
News (1)
- News: https://deafnews.it/en/news/cybersecurity/cisa-orders-3-day-patch-for-cve-2026-55255-in-langflow
7 more references returned by Exploit Observer did not name this CVE or an alias, so they are left out.
VEDAS data as of 2026-11-01T17:12 UTC; fetched 2026-11-02.
Live scores
- EPSS
- 0.009
low predicted chance of attack - VEDAS
- 0.969
strong exploit evidence - On CISA KEV
- Yes, since 2026-07-07
- Detection rule
- None yet
Thin horizontal line: the “likely” (EPSS 0.10) or “strong” (VEDAS 0.90) threshold. Shaded “no data” areas are periods when cve-scores did not publish.
Who is affected
| Product | Affected | Not affected |
|---|---|---|
| langflow-ai langflow | version < 1.9.1 | Not stated |
Version ranges exactly as the CVE record states them. “Before X” means X is the first fixed version.
Exploit Observer also maps it to: langflow langflow, pypi langflow, сообщество_свободного_программного_обеспечения langflow.
How to fix it
CISA required action: Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset’s internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.
Vendor guidance:
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-qrpv-q767-xqq2
- https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk
- https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-implementation-guidance-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-55255
How to detect it
There is no open VEDAS detection rule for this bug yet. It is listed on the detection gaps page if CISA has confirmed attacks.
References
Exploits and technical analysis
- https://webflow.sysdig.com/blog/understanding-langflow-cve-2026-55255-and-why-higher-cvss-vulnerabilities-arent-always-the-most-exploited (third-party-advisory)
Government sources
- https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-55255 (government-resource)
Other references
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-qrpv-q767-xqq2 (x_refsource_CONFIRM)
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12832 (x_refsource_MISC)
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/2c9f498d664a3c32698b57d7c5e752625291060e (x_refsource_MISC)
Other databases
Where this comes from
This advisory is generated automatically by VEDAS from: CVE.org record, CISA KEV, cve-scores (EPSS and VEDAS), Exploit Observer. Text in quotes is reproduced from the source; everything else is a fixed template filled with source fields. Nothing here is written by a language model. Check the vendor advisory before acting, and read how VEDAS and Exploit Observer work, and their limits.