CVE-2026-24423: SmarterTools SmarterMail Missing Authentication for Critical Function Vulnerability
Advisory generated from the CVE record, CISA, Exploit Observer and VEDAS: what it is, whether it is exploited, who is affected, and how to fix and detect it.
Generated by VEDAS. Scores as of 2026-11-01 19:19 UTC. Rebuilt every few hours from cve-scores, CISA KEV and vedas-signatures. How this works and its limits.
What it is
SmarterTools SmarterMail versions prior to build 9511 contain an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the ConnectToHub API method. The attacker could point the SmarterMail to the malicious HTTP server, which serves the malicious OS command. This command will be executed by the vulnerable application.
Description quoted from the CVE record (assigned by VulnCheck, published 2026-01-23).
Weakness: CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function
How it can be exploited
Exploitable over the network with low attack complexity with no special attack requirements needing no privileges and no user interaction. Impact: confidentiality high, integrity high, availability high. CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CISA assessment (SSVC): CISA assesses exploitation as active. Automatable: yes. Technical impact: total.
- On CISA KEV since
- 2026-02-05
- US federal deadline
- 2026-02-26
- Ransomware use
- Yes
Public exploit evidence (Exploit Observer)
Also known as: BDU:2026-01226, CNNVD-202601-3955, EUVD-2026-4273, GHSA-7jpw-fm5p-f98m
VEDAS cluster: VEDAS:FLUTTERSHADE
Exploit Observer links 9 pieces of public exploit code or detection modules that name this CVE or one of its aliases.
Exploit code and modules (9)
Code that names this CVE. A repository can be a working exploit, a scanner, a fake or malware; read it before running anything.
- Nuclei template: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei-templates/main/http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-24423.yaml
- Code repository: https://github.com/aavamin/cve-2026-24423
- Code repository: https://github.com/cyberalp0/smartermail-cve-2026-24423
- Code repository: https://github.com/cyberalp0/smartermail-cve-2026-24423-
- Code repository: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARPSyndicate/vedas-signatures/main/nuclei/2026/CVE-2026-24423.yaml
- Code repository: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARPSyndicate/vedas-signatures/main/nuclei/2026/CVE-2026-24423.yaml
- Code repository: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARPSyndicate/vedas-signatures/main/suricata/2026/CVE-2026-24423.rules
- Code repository: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARPSyndicate/vedas-signatures/main/suricata/2026/CVE-2026-24423.rules
- Code repository: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARPSyndicate/vedas-signatures/main/suricata/2026/CVE-2026-24423.rules
Vulnerability databases and vendor advisories (6)
Catalogue entries, not exploit evidence.
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/enisa/EUVD-2026-4273
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7jpw-fm5p-f98m
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24423
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-24423
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://www.cnnvd.org.cn/home/globalSearch?keyword=CNNVD-202601-3955
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://www.tenable.com/cve/CVE-2026-24423
25 more references returned by Exploit Observer did not name this CVE or an alias, so they are left out.
VEDAS data as of 2026-11-01T17:12 UTC; fetched 2026-11-02.
Live scores
- EPSS
- 0.882
very likely to be attacked soon - VEDAS
- 0.986
strong exploit evidence - On CISA KEV
- Yes, since 2026-02-05
Thin horizontal line: the “likely” (EPSS 0.10) or “strong” (VEDAS 0.90) threshold. Shaded “no data” areas are periods when cve-scores did not publish.
Who is affected
| Product | Affected | Not affected |
|---|---|---|
| SmarterTools SmarterMail | before 100.0.9511 | Not stated |
Version ranges exactly as the CVE record states them. “Before X” means X is the first fixed version.
Exploit Observer also maps it to: smartertools smartermail, smartertools_inc. smartermail.
How to fix it
Fixed versions stated in the CVE record: 100.0.9511.
CISA required action: Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
Vendor guidance:
- https://www.smartertools.com/smartermail/release-notes/current (release-notes, patch)
How to detect it
Nuclei template (active check)
Smartermail - Missing Authentication
SmarterTools SmarterMail versions prior to build 9511 contain an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the ConnectToHub API method. The attacker could point the SmarterMail to the malicious HTTP server, which serves the malicious OS command.
Name and description quoted from the template, written by VEDAS.
The template sends 1 request (POST /api/v1/settings/sysadmin/connect-to-hub); it confirms through an out-of-band callback (interactsh), so the scanner must be able to receive it; it decides using word matchers. Severity in the template: critical. Marked as not yet verified against a live vulnerable target.
Run it against a host you own or are authorised to test:
nuclei -u https://your-host -t CVE-2026-24423.yamlShow the template (41 lines)
id: CVE-2026-24423
info:
name: "Smartermail - Missing Authentication"
author: vedas-arpsyndicate
severity: critical
description: |
SmarterTools SmarterMail versions prior to build 9511 contain an unauthenticated remote code execution
vulnerability in the ConnectToHub API method. The attacker could point the SmarterMail to the malicious HTTP
server, which serves the malicious OS command.
reference:
- https://www.exploit.observer/?keyword=CVE-2026-24423&match=exact
- https://subdomain.center/?engine=ammonites&keyword=smartermail&match=exact
classification:
cvss-metrics: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss-score: 9.8
cve-id: CVE-2026-24423
cwe-id: CWE-306
metadata:
verified: false
tags: cve,cve2026,smartermail,rce,oast,kev,vkev
http:
- raw:
- |
POST /api/v1/settings/sysadmin/connect-to-hub HTTP/1.1
Host: {{Hostname}}
Content-Type: application/json
{"hubAddress":"http://{{interactsh-url}}","oneTimePassword":"{{randstr}}","nodeName":"{{randstr}}"}
matchers-condition: and
matchers:
- type: word
part: interactsh_protocol
words:
- "http"
- type: word
part: interactsh_request
words:
- "setup-initial-connection"
Suricata rules (network detection)
1 rule that alert on traffic matching this exploit: VEDAS CVE-2026-24423 Smartermail - Missing Authentication. Add them to your Suricata rule set and reload.
Show the rules
alert http $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"VEDAS CVE-2026-24423 Smartermail - Missing Authentication"; flow:established,to_server; http.uri; content:"connect-to-hub"; nocase; http.request_body; content:"http://"; nocase; fast_pattern; classtype:web-application-attack; reference:cve,CVE-2026-24423; reference:url,https://www.exploit.observer/?keyword=CVE-2026-24423&match=exact; reference:url,https://subdomain.center/?engine=ammonites&keyword=smartermail&match=exact; sid:1010228; rev:1;)
CVE-2026-24423.rules on GitHub
References
Vendor advisories and patches
- https://www.smartertools.com/smartermail/release-notes/current (release-notes, patch)
Exploits and technical analysis
- https://code-white.com/public-vulnerability-list/#systemadminsettingscontrollerconnecttohub-missing-authentication-in-smartermail (third-party-advisory)
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/smartertools-smartermail-unauthenticated-rce-via-connecttohub-api (third-party-advisory)
Government sources
- https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-24423 (government-resource)
Other databases
Where this comes from
This advisory is generated automatically by VEDAS from: CVE.org record, CISA KEV, cve-scores (EPSS and VEDAS), Exploit Observer, vedas-signatures. Text in quotes is reproduced from the source; everything else is a fixed template filled with source fields. Nothing here is written by a language model. Check the vendor advisory before acting, and read how VEDAS and Exploit Observer work, and their limits.